FEED Validator

Congratulations!

This is a valid RSS feed.

Recommendations

This feed is valid, but interoperability with the widest range of feed readers could be improved by implementing the following recommendations.

• line 1, column 38: Use of unknown namespace: http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008 [help]

  <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/200 ...
                                        ^

• line 1, column 38: Unable to validate namespace: http://schemas.google.com/g/2005. See the Google Data specification at https://developers.google.com/gdata/docs/1.0/elements [help]

  <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/200 ...
                                        ^

• line 1, column 598: title should not contain HTML: ' (2 occurrences) [help]

  ... ;s blog about IBM Domino &amp;amp; Notes</title><description></descripti ...
                                               ^

• line 354, column 657: title should not contain HTML: & [help]

  ... dition affect IBM Domino &amp;amp; Notes</title><description>&lt;p dir=& ...
                                               ^

• line 398, column 300: Missing atom:link with rel="self" [help]

  ... </author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>
                                               ^

Source: https://64bitdomino.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

1. <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-684109870563644688</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>domino</category><category>notes</category><title>64bit&amp;#39;s blog about IBM Domino &amp;amp; Notes</title><description></description><link>https://64bitdomino.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (64bit)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>13</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-684109870563644688.post-7188624485434205738</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 04:39:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2019-01-15T12:39:39.501+08:00</atom:updated><title>Gotcha for Inline View Indexing</title><description>Since Domino FP9, IBM has introduced Inline View Indexing to keep critical views up to date.&lt;br /&gt;
2. <br />
3. So I have gone through the instructions in<br />
4. <br />
5. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSKTMJ_9.0.1/admin/admn_inline_index_enabling.html<br />
6. <br />
7. thinking implementing is just easy as ABC but sadly it is not.<br />
8. <br />
9. I have followed the instructions, restarted Domino, read through it many times but "show dbs * inline views" and "dbcache show inline views" do not show a single view.<br />
10. <br />
11. Good old IBM Support replied that the DB needs to be on ODS52 and IMAP should not be enabled for the DB.<br />
12. <br />
13. These requirements are not mentioned in the instructions but my DB has already met the requirements and it is still not working.<br />
14. <br />
15. In the end, after much research, I found out that transaction logging needs to be enabled in the server for Inline View Indexing to work.<br />
16. <br />
17. Meanwhile IBM is still working on this problem as I did not update them of my finding.</description><link>https://64bitdomino.blogspot.com/2019/01/gotcha-for-inline-view-indexing.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (64bit)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-684109870563644688.post-7289096016666332373</guid><pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2018 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2018-03-04T01:00:38.862+08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">domino</category><title>Beware not to abort compact -REPLICA -RESTART</title><description>Due to some of our DBs encountered &quot;Unable to extend an ID table&quot; error, I have scheduled compact -REPLICA -RESTART to run on these DBs every weekend.&lt;br /&gt;
18. <br />
19. One fine weekend, our users decided to access these DBs but compact -REPLICA is still running on 1 large DB.<br />
20. <br />
21. Thinking that compact -REPLICA replicates the DB to a new .REPL file, if I quit the compact task, Domino should be smart enough to stop the local replication and delete the new .REPL file, leaving everything untouched.<br />
22. <br />
23. Boy I am so wrong and this caused me several angry users.<br />
24. <br />
25. What happened?<br />
26. <br />
27. compact -REPLICA -RESTART was running on a large DB, the documents are sync and it is syncing views to the .REPL file<br />
28. <br />
29. I stopped compact task in Domino Administrator client, and suddenly the remaining views syncing process completed fast (but actually the remaining views are not sync at all)<br />
30. <br />
31. [1BA8:0004-2388] Compact -REPLICA, syncing view: Unxxxxx, ID: 003FF26A, from DB: E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf, to DB: E:\Domino\data\xxx.REPL  <br />
32. [1BA8:0004-2388] Compact -REPLICA, syncing view: Utxxx, ID: 0000A7A2, from DB: E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf, to DB: E:\Domino\data\xxx.REPL                    <br />
33. [1BA8:0004-2388] Compact -REPLICA, syncing view: Wexxxx, ID: 0000A57A, from DB: E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf, to DB: E:\Domino\data\xxx.REPL  <br />
34. [1BA8:0004-2388] Compact -REPLICA, syncing view: Wixxx, ID: 0000A552, from DB: E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf, to DB: E:\Domino\data\xxx.REPL                      <br />
35. [1BA8:0004-2388] Compact -REPLICA, bring database online E:\Domino\data\xxx.REPL<br />
36. [1BA8:0004-2388]         Database Name            Refs Mod  FDs  LockWaits/AvgWait #Waiters MaxWaiters Online<br />
37. [1BA8:0004-2388] Compact -REPLICA, initial population complete for DB: E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf<br />
38. [1BA8:0004-2388] Compact -REPLICA, drop all users for E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf                                          <br />
39. [1BA8:0004-2388]         Database Name            Refs Mod  FDs  LockWaits/AvgWait #Waiters MaxWaiters Online<br />
40. [1BA8:0004-2388] E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf      2   Y   6        0      0        0       4         Y<br />
41. [0DE4:0009-13D0] drop xxx.nsf<br />
42. [1BA8:0004-2388] Compact -REPLICA, take database offline for E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf<br />
43. [1BA8:0004-2388] Compact -REPLICA, take database offline for E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf succeeded - offline: 1, references: 2    <br />
44. [1BA8:0004-2388] Compact -REPLICA, bring database online E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf<br />
45. [1BA8:0004-2388]         Database Name            Refs Mod  FDs LockWaits/AvgWait #Waiters MaxWaiters Online<br />
46. [1BA8:0004-2388] Compact -REPLICA, needs to restart server to complete compaction for DB: E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf<br />
47. [1BA8:0004-2388] 20/01/2018 12:29:15 PM  Error compacting E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf,  compactdb.ind -REPLICA -RESTART -# 4: Program shutdown in progress<br />
48. [1BA8:0004-2388] 20/01/2018 12:29:15 PM  Database compactor deferring 'restart server' for  E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf,   compactdb.ind -REPLICA -RESTART -# 4<br />
49. [1BA8:0002-1A48] 20/01/2018 12:29:16 PM  Database compactor issued a 'restart server', compactdb.ind -REPLICA -RESTART -# 4<br />
50. [1BA8:0002-1A48] 20/01/2018 12:29:16 PM  Database compactor process shutdown<br />
51. [0DE4:0009-13D0] restart server<br />
52. <br />
53. After server was restarted, Domino proceed to replace the DB with the .REPL file! And the problem is Domino does not continue syncing the rest of the views which it does not completed earlier!<br />
54. <br />
55. Compact -REPLICA, check rename of NSF file with existing restart flag, DB: E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf<br />
56. [249C:0092-1C68] Compact -REPLICA, rename with ORIG file E:\Domino\data\xxx.ORIG, DB: E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf, deleting ORIG, error: No error<br />
57. [249C:0092-1C68] Compact -REPLICA, rename of NSF file with existing restart flag, DB: E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf<br />
58. [249C:0092-1C68] Compact -REPLICA, shift: E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf => E:\Domino\data\xxx.ORIG, E:\Domino\data\xxx.REPL => E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf<br />
59. [249C:0092-1C68] Compact -REPLICA, rename complete for DB: E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf<br />
60. [249C:0092-1C68] Compact -REPLICA, resync of NSF file with existing restart flag, DB: E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf<br />
61. [249C:0092-1C68] Compact -REPLICA, take database offline E:\Domino\data\xxx.ORIG<br />
62. [249C:0092-1C68] Clearing DBIID D581A1A5 for DB E:\Domino\data\xxx.ORIG<br />
63. [249C:0092-1C68] Compact -REPLICA, no refresh file E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf, from DB: E:\Domino\data\xxx.ORIG since:  20/01/2018 08:03:28 AM, data: 20/01/2018 07:01:19 AM, nondata: 20/01/2018 01:00:56 AM<br />
64. [249C:0092-1C68] Compact -REPLICA, syncing unread from DB: E:\Domino\data\xxx.ORIG to DB: E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf    <br />
65. [249C:0092-1C68] Compact -REPLICA, NSFDbCompactSyncFolders: Replicating folders  Since time (20/01/2018 08:03:28 AM), Src time (), Dst time ()<br />
66. [249C:0092-1C68] [249C:0092-1C68] Compact -REPLICA, NSFDbCompactSyncFolders: NSFStartFolderReplSource->0x3AE=Folders in database are up to date<br />
67. [249C:0092-1C68] Compact -REPLICA, bring database online E:\Domino\data\xxx.ORIG<br />
68. [249C:0092-1C68] 20/01/2018 12:30:12 PM  Recovery Manager: Assigning new DBIID for E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf (need new backup for media recovery).<br />
69. [249C:0092-1C68] 20/01/2018 12:30:12 PM  Compacting E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf (), restart completing, -REPLICA -RESTART               [249C:0092-1C68]         Database Name            Refs Mod  FDs LockWaits/AvgWait  #Waiters MaxWaiters Online<br />
70. [249C:0092-1C68] Compact -REPLICA, delete E:\Domino\data\xxx.ORIG                                        <br />
71. [249C:0092-1C68] Compact -REPLICA, complete for DB: E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf<br />
72. [249C:0092-1C68] 20/01/2018 12:30:14 PM  Compacted E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf (), restart completed, -REPLICA -RESTART<br />
73. [249C:0092-1C68] 20/01/2018 12:30:14 PM  Compacted E:\Domino\data\xxx.nsf (), increased by 2659328K bytes (<1%), -REPLICA -RESTART<br />
74. <br />
75. This results in very slow response while our users tried to open the unsync views which are not built yet.<br />
76. <br />
77. After communicating with our IBM Support, they finally agreed to create <b>SPR # MJCGAWE9MD</b>: Compact -replica Does Not Have A Way To Check What Process It Left Off Before Aborted<br />
78. <br />
79. There is no way to know when IBM decides to make Domino smarter to safely quit compact -REPLICA so I would strongly advise against stopping compact -REPLICA while it is still running.</description><link>https://64bitdomino.blogspot.com/2018/03/beware-not-to-abort-compact-replica.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (64bit)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-684109870563644688.post-7860635638835351163</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 06:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2018-02-14T14:20:05.399+08:00</atom:updated><title>Domino 9.0.1 Feature Pack 10 Interim Fix 1 finally released for all platforms</title><description>This interim fix was released a few days ago but Windows 64bit version was delayed while Windows 32bit was released and then recalled.&lt;br /&gt;
80. <br />
81. This fix is finally released today for all platforms.<br />
82. <br />
83. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21657963&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21657963&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://64bitdomino.blogspot.com/2018/02/domino-901-feature-pack-10-interim-fix.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (64bit)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-684109870563644688.post-9207603889310523628</guid><pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2018-03-04T00:10:13.467+08:00</atom:updated><title>Domino XPages Partial Refresh Problem since Domino 9.0.1 FP8</title><description>After upgrading from Domino 9.0.1 FP7 to FP8 and later FP9, it seems Domino XPages Partial Refresh fail to work correctly using IE through WebSeal. It was fine all these while on Domino 9.0.1 FP7 and earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
84. <div>
85. <br /></div>
86. <div>
87. Problem does not appears if accessing the web application directly without going through WebSeal. Besides that, it also appears good using Chrome passing through WebSeal.</div>
88. <div>
89. <br /></div>
90. <div>
91. Checked IE console / debug log and this error is shown:</div>
92. <div>
93. <br /></div>
94. <div>
95. <div>
96. <b><i>SCRIPT5007: Unable to get property 'match' of undefined or null reference                     </i></b></div>
97. <div>
98. <b><i>File: xspClientDojo.js, Line: 5, Column: 45925  </i></b>                        </div>
99. <div>
100. <br /></div>
101. <div>
102. <b><u>Workaround:</u></b></div>
103. <div>
104. 1. Setup server as Domino 9.0.1 FP7, verified there is no problem.</div>
105. <div>
106. 2. Copy D:\Domino\osgi\shared\eclipse\plugins\com.ibm.xsp.dojo_9.0.1.20160811-1000 folder to another location.</div>
107. <div>
108. 3. Upgrade Domino to 9.0.1 FP9, verified problem appears.</div>
109. <div>
110. 4. Delete D:\Domino\osgi\shared\eclipse\plugins\com.ibm.xsp.dojo_9.0.1.20170803-1411 folder<br />
111. 5. Copy the backed up com.ibm.xsp.dojo_9.0.1.20160811-1000 folder to D:\Domino\osgi\shared\eclipse\plugins\</div>
112. <div>
113. 6. Verified problem no longer appears.</div>
114. <div>
115.                                                                         </div>
116. <div>
117. <b><u>Conclusion:</u></b></div>
118. <div>
119. com.ibm.xsp.dojo_9.0.1.20160811-1000 is working fine but the updated dojo folder is causing this problem.</div>
120. </div>
121. <div>
122. <br /></div>
123. <div>
124. <div>
125. There are some changes in xspClientDojo.js starting from Domino 9.0.1 FP8 which causes this problem.</div>
126. </div>
127. <div>
128. <br /></div>
129. <div>
130. <b><u>Solution:</u></b></div>
131. <div>
132. You may use the workaround above or request a custom hotfix from IBM. This fix is not available in any of the public released FP8 or FP9 Interim Fix or Feature Pack. I am not sure if this is fixed in FP10.</div>
133. <div>
134. <br /></div>
135. <div>
136. This issue is tracked in <b><i>SPR #SRKMAS2J84</i></b>.<br />
137. <a href="https://www-01.ibm.com/support/entdocview.wss?uid=swg1LO93190" target="_blank">https://www-01.ibm.com/support/entdocview.wss?uid=swg1LO93190</a></div>
138. <div>
139. <br /></div>
140. <div>
141. IBM Support has built a custom hotfix 901FP9HF212 created on top of 901FP9 IF2 + SRKMAS2J84 plus the following fixes which appears to fix the problem in my test server:</div>
142. <div>
143. <br /></div>
144. <div>
145. <div>
146. <b><i>PALT9Z3NZ8</i></b>:  This.Editor.Getdata Is Not A Function If Doing A Refresh Onclientload                  <b><i>RGAU9R2HWB</i></b>:  Customizing The Toolbar In Rich Text Control Of Xpages Does Not Work With Partial Refreshes In Notes 901fp2</div>
147. <div>
148. <b><i>RGAUAHBF9U</i></b>:  Xpages: Djtabcontainer Extlib Control - Toolbar In Rich Text Control Of Xpages Is Not Consistent With Different Tabs</div>
149. <div>
150. <b><i>LHEY9MHHFA</i></b>:  Spellchecker not working for some locales</div>
151. <div>
152. <b><i>MKEE9ZBHWW</i></b>:  XPages, Rich Text control, Spell Check - Danish language using en-US dictionary  </div>
153. </div>
154. <div>
155. <br /></div>
156. </description><link>https://64bitdomino.blogspot.com/2018/02/domino-xpages-partial-refresh-problem.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (64bit)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-684109870563644688.post-2045032979153685287</guid><pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 09:58:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2018-02-03T19:04:16.519+08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">domino</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">notes</category><title>IBM Notes / Domino 9.0.1 Feature Pack 10 Released ! ... but with some problems</title><description>I have been tracking the release status of Domino 9.0.1 FP10 and it was stucked at Stage 2: Code Freeze and thus I am thinking it might take some time to be released.&lt;br /&gt;
157. <br />
158. All of a sudden at 1 Feb 2018, it was released to public and it was still showing Stage 2. After a day, it finally jumped to Stage 5: Web Posting<br />
159. <br />
160. <a href="http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/fixlist.nsf/(Progress)/9.0.1%20FP10">http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/fixlist.nsf/(Progress)/9.0.1%20FP10</a><br />
161. <br />
162. There are tons of new features and bug fixes as mentioned in the release note. I noted there are some changes in this final release note compared to the preliminary release note. It seems the JVM in this feature pack is the newer Java 1.8 SR5 FP6 instead of what was mentioned earlier (SR4 FP10).<br />
163. <br />
164. Hold on ! Before you rush to download and install it to all your servers. As reported by Daniel, there are some reported problems in this newly released feature pack.<br />
165. <a href="http://blog.nashcom.de/nashcomblog.nsf/dx/notesdomino901fp10-issues-ibm-is-working-on-if1-and-is-listening-for-more-feedback.htm">http://blog.nashcom.de/nashcomblog.nsf/dx/notesdomino901fp10-issues-ibm-is-working-on-if1-and-is-listening-for-more-feedback.htm</a><br />
166. <br />
167. IBM is aware of the following issues and fixes for several issues are in progress, with delivery of a fix, FP10 IF1, being planned for the week of February 5.<br />
168. <br />
169. Issues being worked include the following:<br />
170. <br />
171. SMTP Mails with Umlauts are broken after installing FP10, being tracked under <i><b>SPR #JBAMAVKUPX</b></i><br />
172. FP10 version incorrect in NSF API NSFDbGetMajMinVersion, being tracked under <b><i>SPR #KBRNAVLMA3</i></b><br />
173. <br />
174. If you use embedded Sametime and haven't already, please review the information in Sametime Embedded returns error after install of Notes 9.0.1 FP10 on top of Notes 9.0.1 FP9 + Sametime 9.0.x<br />
175. <br />
176. <a href="https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/LotusSupport/entry/Listening_to_your_feedback_on_Notes_Domino_9_0_1_FP10?lang=en">https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/LotusSupport/entry/Listening_to_your_feedback_on_Notes_Domino_9_0_1_FP10?lang=en</a><br />
177. <br />
178. There might be more issues not known yet, I would recommend NOT TO upgrade to FP10 on any of your production servers for now.<br />
179. <br />
180. <br />
181. &lt;br /&gt;</description><link>https://64bitdomino.blogspot.com/2018/02/ibm-notes-domino-901-feature-pack-10.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (64bit)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-684109870563644688.post-1595362440883028310</guid><pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 09:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2018-02-04T01:22:04.731+08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">domino</category><title>[Domino 9.0.1 FP9] Occasional Domino Task Hang on non-transaction logged server</title><description>We have upgraded our mail server (non-transaction logged) few month ago from Domino 9.0.1 FP8 to FP9 IF1 and since then we experienced occasional Domino task hang few times in a month.&lt;br /&gt;
182. <br />
183. Domino task such as Indexer and Replicator will hang on a certain mailbox and the mailbox is no longer accessible. Everything looks fine again after we restarted Domino. And when this appears again the next time, it will be a different mailbox.<br />
184. <br />
185. We managed to run manual NSD when this happened and requested IBM Support to check on this.<br />
186. <br />
187. It appears that this is a known issue in  Domino 9.0.1 FP9 which happens on non transaction logged server and with warning quota set to DBs (mostly on mail server, as we set quota to mailboxes).<br />
188. <br />
189. <i><b>SPR #KBRNASPR6L</b></i> - Domino server hangs in UBMDelayThreadDebug on non Transaction logging enabled servers.<br />
190. <br />
191. <b>Solution (Either one the following will prevent this):</b><br />
192. <br />
193. 1. Submit a PMR to IBM Support to obtain a custom hotfix. (this fix is not available in any of the public released interim fix for Domino 9.0.1 FP9.)<br />
194. <br />
195. 2. Enable transaction logging.<br />
196. <br />
197. 3. Upgrade to Domino 9.0.1 FP10 which includes this fix. (Not recommended for the moment, suggest to wait for Domino 9.0.1 FP10 IF1 which fixes problems in FP10)</description><link>https://64bitdomino.blogspot.com/2018/02/domino-901-fp9-occasional-domino-task.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (64bit)</author><thr:total>4</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-684109870563644688.post-4608038419172450238</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 08:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2018-02-03T19:03:56.854+08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">notes</category><title>Notes client fail to deliver external email when exceeded mailbox quota</title><description>We noticed that while mailbox has exceeded a set quota, if user proceed to send an email with both internal and external recipients, only internal recipients will receive the email but Notes client will not deliver the email to external address.&lt;br /&gt;
198. <br />
199. There is no delivery failure message or notification informing the failure of external email delivery. This is a serious problem as there might be many important emails not sent to external without the sender's knowledge, and since it is able to send to internal recipients, the sender might even be convinced it was already sent to external.<br />
200. <br />
201. I have submitted a case to IBM and this problem is verified and tracked under SPR#NNAI8ZZ4EK <a href="http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1LO72557" target="_blank">http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1LO72557</a>, we are currently using IBM Notes 9.0.1 FP9 and we recalled that the problem happens even with Notes 8.5.3 so I assumed that this affects all version of Notes client.<br />
202. <br />
203. IBM has provided a Notes client hotfix to us but there is no word when will this fix included in any of the future public released Feature Pack or Interim Fix, which is really frustrating.<br />
204. <br />
205. To anyone out there who encounters this problem, you may submit a case with IBM quoting the SPR number to obtain a fix for this issue.</description><link>https://64bitdomino.blogspot.com/2017/12/notes-client-fail-to-deliver-external.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (64bit)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-684109870563644688.post-6448982586524486578</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 04:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2018-02-03T19:03:43.691+08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">domino</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">notes</category><title>Sneak peek of Notes / Domino 9.0.1 FP10</title><description>IBM Notes / Domino 9.0.1 FP10 is scheduled to be released at Q1 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
206. <a href="http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/fixlist.nsf/(Progress)/$First?OpenDocument" target="_blank">http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/fixlist.nsf/(Progress)/$First?OpenDocument</a><br />
207. <br />
208. For those who are interested to know what are included in this Feature Pack 10, here is a sneak peak of the goodies.<br />
209. <br />
210. This is not the final confirmed features and fixes as it might be subject to any further change by IBM.<br />
211. <br />
212. <br />
213. <b>New Features in IBM Notes/Domino® 9.0.1 Social Edition Feature Pack 10 </b><br />
214. <br />
215. The documentation in Knowledgebase will be updated with these new features to coincide with the ship date of 9.0.1 FP10 <br />
216. <br />
217. 1) The JVM in Designer is Upgraded to use 1.8 at compile time <br />
218. <br />
219. With this new upgrade, you can launch Designer client and leverage Java 1.8 compile time features in building applications. For full compatibility, apps compiled in FP10 should be deployed on Notes or Domino FP10 and higher. Java apps may run on Notes/Domino 9.0.1 FP8 and higher as that release upgrade to Java 1.8 runtime. However, Application best practice is to compile with the lowest common denominator to the client/server version deployed. <br />
220. <br />
221. 2) Eclipse Platform Upgraded to 4.6.2 - The 9.0.1 FP10 platform is upgraded from Eclipse 3.4.2 to Eclipse 4.6.2. This includes SWT, OSGi, Jface and other re-lated Eclipse plugins. Notes, Designer, Embedded Sametime, and Connections Plugins now leverage Eclipse 4.6.2. The Domino server uses the OSGi bundles from Eclipse 4.6.2 for servlet and XPages access. <br />
222. <br />
223. <br />
224. 3) Embedded Sametime Upgraded To 901 By Default <br />
225. <br />
226. The default version of the Embedded Sametime in the Notes Client has been upgraded to the 9.0.1 version by default, which eliminates the need for an add-on installer for Sametime. <br />
227. <br />
228. 4) The GSKit libraries are upgraded to Version 8.0.50.84 for both client & server. GSKit is used for FIPs support, AES , 1024+ RSA, and Diffie-Hellman. <br />
229. <br />
230. 5) Japanese User Interface Update <br />
231. <br />
232. An optional Japanese User Interface update includes fixes for high-impact localization defects. The 'IBM Notes Client 9.0.1 FP10 Japanese User Interface Update' requires 9.0.1 Japanese Client/Japanese MUI + FP10. <br />
233. <br />
234. 6) Add-on Installer for Notes CCM (Connections Content Manager) <br />
235. <br />
236. An add-on installer for Notes CCM eliminates the need for special hotfixes but does require 9.0.1 FP10. This optional add-on allows a Notes client to show Libraries from CCM for use with email and calendar. <br />
237. <br />
238. Note: The Notes CCM now supports the Dutch language in addition to previously supported languages For more details on CCM, see <a href="https://www.ibm.com/us-en/marketplace/connections-content-management">https://www.ibm.com/us-en/marketplace/connections-content-management</a>. <br />
239. <br />
240. <b>Fixes contained in this Feature Pack </b><br />
241. <br />
242. A plus symbol (+) before the SPR number indicates a fix for a regression bug. A regression bug is an issue that was introduced in a Maintenance Release but did not exist in previous releases of that code stream. For example, a bug that appears in 9.0.1 but did not exist in 9.0.0 is a regression. <br />
243. <br />
244. If an APAR exists for the corresponding SPR, the APAR number will appear in parentheses next to the SPR number. For example, SPR #nnnnnnnnnn (LO12345). <br />
245. <br />
246. <br />
247. The Fix List database on <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.lotus.com_ldd_r5fixlist.nsf&d=DwMGaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=5m7any1iTKdi03bQSzmBCfXVjtbdtSIkFo0d5BYBMKo&m=qRF1cSU89mVtSzuwfOAI4Mq_fairbjf3-zgIS9ySoqU&s=K0-pHLKXzG1t5ERMFAsbrEMjZ1lADAW3VlrocE3obRg&e=">developerWorks</a> contains the description of each fix in this Feature Pack, and indicates which platform(s) have been fixed. <br />
248. <br />
249. <b>9.0.1 Feature Pack 10 Preliminary Fix List descriptions:</b><br />
250. <div>
251. <br />
252. <b>Domino® Server</b> <br />
253. <br />
254. +YNABANLSUB - Fixed an error 4399  "Value is out of range"  when running DeleteUser LotusScript. This was a regression introduced in 9.0.1 FP7 <br />
255. <br />
256. LRHG9T78WW (LO83614) - Fixed an HTTP crash in memory allocation when Sametime calls into Domino <br />
257. <br />
258. MSKAAPEQ7M (LO92705) - Fixed a server crash during ID vault processing <br />
259. <br />
260. PKIM9XSUTU (LO89753) - Fixed an issue where an SSL certificate validation does not allow partial chains <br />
261. <br />
262. CRPOA64RNM (LO87648) - Fix an issue where Domino doclinks no longer convert to a usable format for iOS <br />
263. <br />
264. JAQOAKRTUM (LO91921) - Fixed a Domino Server crash when processing user certificates in the Domino Directory <br />
265. <br />
266. +JCARAQSJB6 (LO92949) - Fixed an SMTP issue which can cause malformed headers & prevent Internet mail delivery. This was a regression introduced in 9.0.1 FP9 <br />
267. <br />
268. MKIN9Z6UZ2 (LO90767) - Fixed an issue in the web server when processing graphic records <br />
269. <br />
270. +PMGYAMDCQX (LO92318) - Fixed a Server crash due to a nullhandle of a note. This was a regression introduced in 9.0.1 FP9 <br />
271. <br />
272. RMAA9ENABR (LO78449) - Fixed a Domino Server crash on the Dircat task <br />
273. <br />
274. TSUAANL4QT (LO92599) - Fixed the error "Value is out of range" in the NotesAdministrationProcess #DeleteUser <br />
275. <br />
276. +YNABANLSUB (LO92582) - Fixed the error 4399 "Value Is Out Of Range" When Running Deleteuser Lotusscript.  This was a regression introduced in 901FP8. <br />
277. <br />
278. ASHHABSBHK (LO89599) - Fixed an issue where running Dbmt on an NSF file, intermittently leaves the ORIG file. <br />
279. <br />
280. IISA9QEEAH (LO82584) - Fixed a Domino Server crash due to deadlock in the unread code <br />
281. <br />
282. +TPON9N3EYE (LO81657) - Fixed an issue that resulted in a message being sent that dropped the 'body' content, resulting in a messaging being sent with only the disclaimer. This would occur with disclaimers enabled and a returnreceipt field set to 0. This was a regression introduced in 9.0.1. <br />
283. <br />
284. LCAYAC7JU4 (LO89729) - Fixed an issue where delivery failure notifications are going dead in the mail.box rather than transferring to O365.  Notes.ini parameter POSTMASTER_WITH_BRACKETS=1 needs to be added to enable the fix. <br />
285. <br />
286. SLAEAGNLBF (LO91113) - Fixed an issue where autoprocessing of update notices took a long time. With this fix, if the buffer used for autoprocessing is maxed out on a server, auto-processing will stop and defer then work to the client. This fix is on by default but can be disabled by setting CSDisableSummaryCacheAutoStop=1 <br />
287. <br />
288. WHAM9KRHHH (LO80695) - Introduced a new dcontroller.ini (ControllerLogLocation) to control the log path for Domino QoS <br />
289. <br />
290. <div>
291. <b>Notes® Client </b><br />
292. <br />
293. +ACVR9HHS55 (LO79672) - Fixed a Notes Client crash when sending mail to groups from recent contacts.This was a regression introduced in 8.5.3 and 9.0 <br />
294. <br />
295. YGAOAFXLAK (LO90918) - Fixed a Notes Client crashes when processing Cross Domain admin requests <br />
296. <br />
297. ANIAAKYCNY (LO91979) - Fixed the Sametime Awareness icon to display for recipients' alternate name in a Memo <br />
298. <br />
299. RUYAAM2QGC (LO92259) - Fixed an issue with meetings in summary view showing under wrong date, for federated calendar entries created in a different timezone <br />
300. <br />
301. CSAOAKF4XX (LO91821) - Fixed a Notes Client startup performance issue caused by Smart Upgrade initialization in a VMWare VDI <br />
302. <br />
303. JVEKAPMFWR (LO92748 ) - Fixed an issue where mail with Japanese characters are not shown properly on a PC with Chinese regional settings <br />
304. <br />
305. +JVEKAQ5JAL (LO92827) - Fixed a roaming user issue that results in an empty "At Location" field when a user roams to another computer. This was a regression introduced in 9.0.1 FP7 <br />
306. <br />
307. +JVEKAQSGCC (LO92948) - Fixed an issue with shared, private on first use folder not working as expected in 9.0.1 FP9. Folder can not be viewed in the Designer. This is a regression introduced in 9.0.1 FP9. <br />
308. <br />
309. +JVEKARBEP2 (LO93058 ) - Fixed an issue where the contents are not displayed after editing if a Richtext field contains an image and "Store contents as HTML and MIME" is enabled.  This is a regression introduced in 9.0.1 FP9. <br />
310. <br />
311. NDDC9J2LG5: (LO79942) - Fixed an issue where the URL in a forwarded email created using Win8.1 Tablet opens in the embedded browser and not the default OS browser <br />
312. <br />
313. RREN9P9KWR (LO82098) - Fixed an issue where folders will not be expanded when the database is re-opened <br />
314. <br />
315. +JVEKAR7J8F (LO93043 ) - Fixed an issue where public email groups do not expand.  This is a regression introduced in 9.0.1 FP8 <br />
316. <br />
317. XLXZAFZCP2 (LO90940) - Fixed an issue where mails are displayed as unread in Notes after reading the mails on an IMAP client <br />
318. <br />
319. +YGAOALLM2D (LO92139) - Fixed an issue where users are unable to send encrypted mail.  This is a regression introduced in 9.0.1 FP8.<br />
320. <div>
321. <br />
322. <b>iNotes</b>         <br />
323. <br />
324. JVEKAPWDR8 (LO92793 ) - Fixed an issue in iNotes when forwarding an email from Google Chrome a lot of white space is added between the new and the forwarded document <br />
325. <br />
326. +KRAUANKM6K (LO92572) - Fixed an iNotes issue where users are unable to attach two or more files using the Send Function.  This was a regression introduced in 9.0.1 FP7 <br />
327. <br />
328. SDOY9LFER6 (LO81030) - Fix an iNotes issue that fails to open attachment on forwarding or replying message on IE with iNoes ActiveX file attachment utility <br />
329. <br />
330. <b>"IBM Notes Client 9.0.1 FP10 Japanese User Interface Update" Specific SPR's </b><br />
331. <br />
332. TITH9GEC9K (LO79111) - Fix an issue where a mail meeting invitation does not have the day in the subject <br />
333. <br />
334. THIO9KW2FH (LO80689) - To Do From Japanese Notes does not contain the correct Japanese date format characters <br />
335. <br />
336. SKAI9UW3JX - Fix an issue where the 'IDEXTRAFILENAME' parameter does not work in the Japanese Notes Client <br />
337. <br />
338. THIO9L22J3 (LO80781) - Fix an issue where the date formats in the subject of Meeting invitations and Group To Do's are SBCS instead of DBCS <br />
339. <br />
340. TSUA8RA5JW - Fixed an issue where the property box of database is truncated in the Japanese Client <br />
341. <br />
342. CKUAAHB8PN (LO91232) - Fix an issue where it takes long time to open a DJX address list <span style="background-color: white; font-family: "verdana" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 11px;"><br /></span>
343. <a href="http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/fixlist.nsf/WhatsNew/86a6c4ba892f0218852581fc0067b4f4?OpenDocument" target="_blank">http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/fixlist.nsf/WhatsNew/86a6c4ba892f0218852581fc0067b4f4?OpenDocument</a></div>
344. </div>
345. </div>
346. </description><link>https://64bitdomino.blogspot.com/2017/12/sneak-peak-of-notes-domino-901-fp10.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (64bit)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-684109870563644688.post-3768638402085582848</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 09:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2017-08-14T17:33:58.227+08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">domino</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">notes</category><title>Single Copy Template</title><description>&lt;p dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;I was informed to look into implementing Single Copy Template function since we are running out of disk space on our mail server.&lt;/p&gt;
347. <p dir="ltr">I had a hard time searching for detailed of this function and it seems long forgotten by every one.</p>
348. <p dir="ltr">Checked with IBM, they suggested NOT to use this feature due to:</p>
349. <p dir="ltr">1. Not many people use this<br>
350. 2. All users will be impacted if the base template has problem. For example, db corruption. Thus it is risky.</p>
351. </description><link>https://64bitdomino.blogspot.com/2017/08/single-copy-template.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (64bit)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-684109870563644688.post-1023975447461404292</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 02:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2017-08-11T10:28:43.000+08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">domino</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">notes</category><title>Notes / Domino 9.0.1 FP9 releasing soon</title><description>&lt;p dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;IBM Notes / Domino 9.0.1 FP9 release status is now &lt;b&gt;Gold Build&lt;/b&gt;, which means it will be released in the next few days (hopefully).&lt;/p&gt;
352. <p dir="ltr">Notes / Domino release status: http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/fixlist.nsf/(Progress)/901%20FP9</p>
353. <p dir="ltr">Preliminary Release Notes: http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/fixlist.nsf/WhatsNew/12d957b7c277fc728525816300434c53?<u>OpenDocument</u></p>
354. </description><link>https://64bitdomino.blogspot.com/2017/08/notes-domino-901-fp9-releasing-soon.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (64bit)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-684109870563644688.post-7207173744623608950</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 03:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2017-05-24T11:42:11.476+08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">domino</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">notes</category><title>Security Bulletin: Multiple Vulnerabilities in the IBM SDK Java Technology Edition affect IBM Domino &amp;amp; Notes</title><description>&lt;p dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;There are multiple vulnerabilities in IBM&amp;#174; SDK Java&amp;#8482; Technology Edition Version 6 SR16FP35 that affect IBM Domino &amp;amp; Notes. These issues were disclosed as part of the IBM Java SDK updates in Feb. 2017, fixed with Version 6 SR16FP41 and Version 8 SR4FP1.&lt;/p&gt;
355. <p dir="ltr"><b>Affected versions</b>: All Domino version through Domino 9.0.1 FP8 IF3 and all Notes Standard client through Notes Standard Client 9.0.1 FP8 which contains JVM prior to <br>
356. Version 6 SR16FP41 or Version 8 SR4FP1.</p>
357. <p dir="ltr"><b>Domino</b>: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22000516</p>
358. <p dir="ltr"><b>Notes</b>: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22000602</p>
359. <p dir="ltr">Currently only fixes for Domino / Notes 8.5.3 FP6 are available.</p>
360. <p dir="ltr">Fixes for Domino / Notes 9.0.1 are not available yet.</p>
361. </description><link>https://64bitdomino.blogspot.com/2017/05/security-bulletin-multiple.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (64bit)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-684109870563644688.post-8792949671796861145</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2017-05-24T11:08:27.228+08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">notes</category><title> Notes 9.0.1 FP8 crash while open Administrator client at the same time</title><description>We encounter frequent crash with our Notes 9.0.1 FP8 client while open Administrator client at the same time for Domino monitoring.&lt;br /&gt;
362. <br />
363. - Crash happens while switching to another ID while Notes and Domino Administrator is opened and Realtime Statistics (In Domino Administrator -> Server tab -> Peformance) is running.                                                                      <br />
364. - Crash happens while Notes and Domino Administrator is running and Realtime Statistics (In Domino Administrator -> Server tab -> Peformance) is running<br />
365. <br />
366. SPR SBHLAL9MUU has been created for this.</description><link>https://64bitdomino.blogspot.com/2017/05/notes-901-fp8-crash-while-open.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (64bit)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-684109870563644688.post-5085256435467354042</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2017-05-17T23:41:58.838+08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">domino</category><title>Q &amp; A regarding Domino 9.0.1 FP8 new features: Move views out of databases &amp; Increase the document summary data limit to 16 MB</title><description>Domino 9.0.1 FP8 has introduced 2 new features:&amp;nbsp;Move views out of databases &amp;amp; Increase the document summary data limit to 16 MB. There is not much explanation on both features and I have posted some questions to IBM.&lt;br /&gt;
367. <b><br /></b>
368. <b>Q1. To enable both features at the same time, considering our DB are on ODS51 / ODS48, and to reduce compact time, which are the compact options that we need to run? And can we combine these compact options together to save time?</b><br />
369. <br />
370. for -nifnsf, as this option require -c (-replica is not suggested, however, -replica did works once nifnsf of db was successfully turned on) to do the core task of stripping views out of DB/ or moving views back. so any options works well with "-c" should works with "-nifnsf".<br />
371. however, I'd like to mention that "nifnsf" and "largesummary" are mostly used when we turn on/off the feature, no need to repeatly do it on a regular basis.<br />
372. moreover,  large summary enabled DB is irreversible as you know, once you got a document with large summary, it has no way to be automatically shrinked into a regular small summary document<br />
373. <br />
374. <b>Q2. We have schedule compact -REPLICA -RESTART on some of our critical DB, can we combine some of the compact options to upgrade ODS version and enable these 2 features?</b><br />
375. <br />
376. as new featrue does not work old ODS, so I would suggest not to combine upgrade ODS and nifnsf&large-summary in one shot.                     <br />
377. again, as mentioned above, there is no need to repeatly use compact -nifnsf/largesummary.<br />
378. <br />
379. <b>Q3. I noticed there is some performance issue which was fixed in 9.0.1 FP8 IF1, are we able to see any performance improvement or degradation if we enable both new features on a DB?</b><br />
380. <br />
381. these two new feature should not have any dependencies to those performance improvements. so please refer to details about those performance issues to see what it improved.<br />
382. <b><br /></b>
383. <b>Q4. After implementing these 2 new features, are there any issue with our current practice which runs weekly compact -REPLICA -RESTART & updall -R on the DBs?</b><br />
384. <br />
385. once these two features are enabled, it works in background, up to now, we have no open issues for these situation.<br />
386. <br />
387. <b>Q5. Do we need to run regular maintenance on the view DB (.NDX file)? For example, if views are reduced in a DB, does the .NDX file will shrink itself or maintenance is required?</b><br />
388. <br />
389. ndx goes with its master nsf when we do the compact command. a compact to master nsf db could trigger ndx compact on demand.(by default, if the usage of ndx does not meet a specific critira it will be automatically skipped.)<br />
390. <b><br /></b>
391. <b>Q6. Any pending fixes for both new features which are still not released?</b><br />
392. <br />
393. None.<br />
394. <br />
395. <b>Q7. How can we revert the changes if we encounter issues with both new features?</b><br />
396. <br />
397. for nifnsf,  compact db with -nifnsf off and "-c".                     <br />
398. for largesummary, as mentioned above. large summary documents are irreversible. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; </description><link>https://64bitdomino.blogspot.com/2017/05/q-regarding-domino-901-fp8-new-features.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (64bit)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>

If you would like to create a banner that links to this page (i.e. this validation result), do the following:

1. Download the "valid RSS" banner.

2. Upload the image to your own server. (This step is important. Please do not link directly to the image on this server.)

3. Add this HTML to your page (change the image src attribute if necessary):

   <a href="http://www.feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=https%3A//64bitdomino.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default%3Falt%3Drss"><img src="valid-rss-rogers.png" alt="[Valid RSS]" title="Validate my RSS feed" /></a>

If you would like to create a text link instead, here is the URL you can use:

http://www.feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=https%3A//64bitdomino.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default%3Falt%3Drss

Home · About · News · Docs · Terms