This feed does not validate.
In addition, interoperability with the widest range of feed readers could be improved by implementing the following recommendations.
<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns: ...
<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns: ...
<ul style="list-style:none">
</channel>
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?><!-- If you are running a bot please visit this policy page outlining rules you must respect. https://www.livejournal.com/bots/ --><rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' xmlns:atom10='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'><channel> <title>Random Ramblings</title> <link>https://ivazquez.livejournal.com/</link> <description>Random Ramblings - LiveJournal.com</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:41:04 GMT</lastBuildDate> <generator>LiveJournal / LiveJournal.com</generator> <lj:journal>ivazquez</lj:journal> <lj:journalid>12960052</lj:journalid> <lj:journaltype>personal</lj:journaltype>  <item> <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://ivazquez.livejournal.com/9390.html</guid> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:41:04 GMT</pubDate> <title>Gonna put some wheels in motion, get ready 'cause we're coming through</title> <author>ivazquez</author> <link>https://ivazquez.livejournal.com/9390.html</link> <description><p>I just finished watching the XO/RPM FUDCon video, and here are my thoughts, in no particular order:</p><ul><li>Packaging activities as rpms is a lost cause; there are almost none important enough to require root capabilities to install. Package known-good versions of Browse and Terminal with Sugar, and move on.</li><li>Activities are <em>exactly</em> like DVCS repos:</li><ul><li>The master is the versions of the activity from upstream. 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, etc. All versions would be contained within it.</li><li>User-modified versions are branches, each based on a specific version; Kim's is a UI hack based on 1.0, while Miguel's adds additional transports and is based off of 1.1.</li><li>Branches are separate from the trunk; both the trunk and each of the branches can be moved around independently, and the branches depend on the trunk in order to function properly. It will be the job of rainbow or whatnot to reintegrate the activity so that it can be run.</li><li>The icon on the Activity view is the normal icon for the activity, and represents the latest version of the master. It can be right-clicked to either rebase the existing activity to a user branch (or the master as the case may be), or add another icon representing the user branch. User branches would be indicated with the homunculus of the creator as an emblem.</li></ul><li>Activities can still be stored in a central place, perhaps mediated by an "Activity Manager" daemon or process.</li></ul><p>Comments and criticism welcome.</p></description> <comments>https://ivazquez.livejournal.com/9390.html?view=comments#comments</comments> <category>olpc</category> <category>sugar</category> <lj:security>public</lj:security> <lj:reply-count>7</lj:reply-count> </item> <item> <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://ivazquez.livejournal.com/8658.html</guid> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:49:22 GMT</pubDate> <title>I want you stronger, I want you harder</title> <author>ivazquez</author> <link>https://ivazquez.livejournal.com/8658.html</link> <description><h2>Fedora 10 on the XO</h2><p>blah blah <a href="http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/files/XO/XODesktop.png" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">normal Fedora 10 on the XO on a USB drive</a>. Here's how:</p><ol><li>Find a machine that can boot USB devices and that you can install Fedora with.</li><li>Get a drive big enough. In my case it's a 40GB.</li><li>Install Fedora 10 i386 normally, with these options:</li><ul><li>Separate /boot as the first primary partition</li><li>Install grub to /sdX1, not the MBR</li></ul><li>Boot off the USB drive.</li><li>Install the i586 kernel. Use yum shell if you need to remove the i686 kernel at the same time:</li><ul style="list-style:none"><li># yum shell</li><li>&gt; remove kernel.i686</li><li>&gt; install kernel.i586</li><li>&gt; run</li></ul><li>Put <a href="http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/files/XO/xorg.conf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">this xorg.conf</a> in /etc/X11.</li><li>Create the /boot/security directory and put your developer key in it. (optional)</li><li>Create the /boot/boot directory and put <a href="http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/files/XO/olpc.fth" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">this olpc.fth</a> in it.</li><li>Open /boot/grub/grub.conf and /boot/boot/olpc.fth and do the following:</li><ul><li>Replace $args at the bottom of olpc.fth with the i586 kernel arguments from grub.conf.</li><li>Replace vmlinuz0 and initrd0.img with the filenames of the kernel and the initrd respectively.</li></ul></ol><p>You may be able to skip the kernel-swapping step by passing i586 at the install boot prompt. I did not try this.</p><h2>Python 2.6</h2><p>Preparations are now underway to get Python 2.6 into Fedora. Watch the skies in the next few days.</p></description> <comments>https://ivazquez.livejournal.com/8658.html?view=comments#comments</comments> <category>olpc</category> <category>fedora</category> <category>python</category> <lj:security>public</lj:security> <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count> </item></channel></rss> 
